module Algebra.Magma whereprivate variable
ℓ ℓ₁ : Level
A : Type ℓ∞-Magmas🔗
In common mathematical parlance, a magma is a set equipped with a binary operation. In HoTT, we free ourselves from considering sets as a primitive, and generalise to ∞-groupoids: An ∞-magma is a type equipped with a binary operation.
is∞Magma : Type ℓ → Type ℓ
is∞Magma X = X → X → XSince we can canonically identify the predicate is∞Magma with a Structure built with the structure
language, we automatically get a notion of ∞-Magma homomorphism, and a
proof that ∞MagmaStr is a univalent structure.
∞MagmaStr : Structure ℓ is∞Magma
∞MagmaStr = Term→structure (s∙ s→ (s∙ s→ s∙))
∞MagmaStr-univ : is-univalent (∞MagmaStr {ℓ = ℓ})
∞MagmaStr-univ = Term→structure-univalent (s∙ s→ (s∙ s→ s∙))∞-magmas form a viable structure because magmas (and therefore their
higher version) do not axiomatize any paths that would require
further coherence conditions. However, when considering structures with
equalities, like semigroups or loops, we must restrict ourselves to sets
to get a reasonable object, hence the field has-is-set. To be able to properly
generalize over these notions, we define magmas as ∞-magmas whose
carrier type is a set.
Magmas🔗
record is-magma {A : Type ℓ} (_⋆_ : A → A → A) : Type ℓ whereA magma is a set equipped with an arbitrary binary
operation ⋆, on which no further laws are imposed.
field
has-is-set : is-set A
underlying-set : Set ℓ
underlying-set = el _ has-is-set
opaque instance
magma-hlevel : ∀ {n} → H-Level A (2 + n)
magma-hlevel = basic-instance 2 has-is-set
open is-magmaNote that we do not generally benefit from the set truncation of arbitrary magmas -
however, practically all structures built upon is-magma do, since they contain paths
which would require complicated, if not outright undefinable, coherence
conditions.
It also allows us to show that being a magma is a property:
is-magma-is-prop : {_⋆_ : A → A → A} → is-prop (is-magma _⋆_)
is-magma-is-prop x y i .has-is-set =
is-hlevel-is-prop 2 (x .has-is-set) (y .has-is-set) iinstance
H-Level-is-magma
: ∀ {ℓ} {A : Type ℓ} {_⋆_ : A → A → A} {n}
→ H-Level (is-magma _⋆_) (suc n)
H-Level-is-magma = prop-instance is-magma-is-propBy turning the operation parameter into an additional piece of data, we get the notion of a magma structure on a type, as well as the notion of a magma in general by doing the same to the carrier type.
record Magma-on (A : Type ℓ) : Type ℓ where
field
_⋆_ : A → A → A
has-is-magma : is-magma _⋆_
open is-magma has-is-magma public
Magma : (ℓ : Level) → Type (lsuc ℓ)
Magma ℓ = Σ (Type ℓ) Magma-onWe then define what it means for an equivalence between the carrier types of two given magmas to be an equivalence of magmas: it has to preserve the magma operation.
record
Magma≃ (A B : Magma ℓ) (e : A .fst ≃ B .fst) : Type ℓ where
private
module A = Magma-on (A .snd)
module B = Magma-on (B .snd)
field
pres-⋆ : (x y : A .fst) → e .fst (x A.⋆ y) ≡ e .fst x B.⋆ e .fst y
open Magma≃_ = Str-descThe boolean implication magma🔗
open import Data.BoolTo give a somewhat natural example for a magma that is neither
associative, commutative, nor has a two-sided identity element, consider
boolean implication{.Agda imp}. Since the booleans form a
set, this obviously defines a magma:
private
is-magma-imp : is-magma imp
is-magma-imp .has-is-set = hlevel 2We show it is not commutative or associative by giving counterexamples:
imp-not-commutative : ¬ ((x y : Bool) → imp x y ≡ imp y x)
imp-not-commutative commutative = true≠false (commutative false true)
imp-not-associative : ¬ ((x y z : Bool) → imp x (imp y z) ≡ imp (imp x y) z)
imp-not-associative associative = true≠false (associative false false false)It also has no two-sided unit, as can be shown by case-splitting on the candidates:
imp-not-unital
: (x : Bool) → ((y : Bool) → imp x y ≡ y) → ¬ ((y : Bool) → imp y x ≡ y)
imp-not-unital false left-unital right-unital = true≠false (right-unital false)
imp-not-unital true left-unital right-unital = true≠false (right-unital false)